My earliest sports memory that had a huge impact on me was my dad taking me to my first baseball game and having Keith Hernandez flip a baseball over to us as he made the final play of an inning at first base for the New York Mets. A real human moment, seeing Keith, who was the heart and soul of the iconic 1986 New York Mets, so close up. His eyes connected with mine as he smiled at me and my father, and having that tactile piece of baseball in my hands, a physical item I could look upon and remember that moment. 

Sports, in-person, at the game, is a transcendent experience. Nothing else compares to it. 

In the modern era, technology has infiltrated nearly every aspect of our lives, and the domain of sports is no exception. Whether it’s the high-definition, slow-motion replays on our home screens or the complex algorithms that feed us personalized highlights on our smartphones, technology has indisputably transformed the way we consume and enjoy sports. But as we revel in this new age of enhanced experience and accessibility, are we trading off the essential human connection that sports are meant to foster?

One of the most captivating aspects of sports is the raw emotion and spontaneity—think last-second goals, unexpected comebacks, or even just the roar of a crowd. Over-engineered technology might sterilize these elements, creating a more controlled but ultimately less exciting experience. High-fidelity simulations or virtual experiences might come close to replicating the “real thing," but lack the authenticity of being at a live event, surrounded by other fans, feeling the tension in the air.

Over-engineered technology might sterilize these elements, creating a more controlled but ultimately less exciting experience

The concept of the “uncanny valley” can be extended to the way technology is implemented in human sports experiences. As technology is increasingly integrated into sports—for example, through virtual reality experiences, augmented reality overlays, or even AI-powered analytics and simulations—there’s a risk that the technology might diminish the very human elements that make sports compelling in the first place.

The Allure of Tech-Driven Sports Experience

It’s hard to argue against the conveniences that technology has brought into sports viewership. Gone are the days when missing a game meant waiting for the next day’s newspaper for an update. In today’s digital world, not only can we stream games live on multiple devices, but we also have the luxury of virtual reality experiences, real-time stats, and even simulated games. The tech boom has democratized access to sports, making it globally accessible in a way that was unimaginable just a few decades ago.

The Double-Edged Sword of Personalization

One of the most groundbreaking advancements is the personalization algorithms that curate what we see based on our past behaviors and preferences. Did you like a tweet about a spectacular slam dunk? You’ll get an endless stream of similar highlights. Does your smart TV know you watch soccer every weekend? Your home screen is now a dedicated shrine to your favorite sport.

But here lies the paradox: While these algorithms make our experience more personal, they also make it less communal. Are we missing the serendipity of collective experience, the shared moments that happen when we all watch the same highlight reel or the same crucial game, irrespective of our personal preferences?

The Vanishing Sense of Community

Before the age of smartphones and smart TVs, sports were a communal affair. Fans gathered around a single screen or, better yet, in stadiums to share the highs and lows of a game. The advent of technology, while making sports more accessible, has also made the experience more solitary. Streaming a game on your personal device may offer convenience, but it lacks the collective euphoria or despair that you can only feel in a crowd of fellow fans.

Are we missing the serendipity of collective experience, the shared moments that happen when we all watch the same highlight reel or the same crucial game, irrespective of our personal preferences?

The Question of Authenticity

When we talk about the human connection in sports, we’re also talking about the authenticity of the game. Advanced technologies like VAR (Video Assistant Referee) in soccer or Hawk-Eye in tennis have brought more accuracy but also more debates. Does the quest for perfection take away from the essence of the sport, which is, at its core, a human endeavor complete with flaws and imperfections? What is sports radio going to obsess about, or even Sports Twitter (now X) going to argue over when the robots make perfect, unquestionable decisions on every play?

So, how do we reconcile this? The path toward evolution is inevitable for sports. Tech is going to change fundamentally all the games I grew up playing and watching. The answer may lie in a hybrid model that marries the best of both worlds, designed to attract a younger, modern audience without alienating traditional fans.

Community-Driven Live Events

One possible avenue is to create more community-driven live events, perhaps in smaller, more intimate settings. Imagine venues equipped with advanced technology, but designed to foster a sense of community.

Think interactive screens that not only display stats but allow fans to communicate with each other, creating a “virtual stadium experience” for those who can’t be there in person.

Could this blend of tech and community spirit rejuvenate local leagues and lesser-watched sports, and create a tailwind for insurgent leagues?

Gamification of the Live Experience

Gamification has proven to be incredibly effective at increasing engagement across various platforms, particularly among younger audiences.

What if sports leagues introduced more gamification elements into live sports experiences? You could earn points for attending games, for participating in live polls, or by predicting the outcome of plays.

This isn’t about gambling, since most younger viewers won’t be able to participate. This is about leveraging their need for interactivity to nurture and build an affinity for the games in a way they’re more familiar and intrigued by.

As we navigate this tech-driven landscape, it’s crucial to pause and reflect on what we might be losing in the process. The marriage between sports and technology is seemingly inevitable, but that doesn’t mean we should ignore the growing disconnect.

After all, at its heart, sports are about more than just scores or spectacular plays; they are about human connections, shared experiences, and the beauty of imperfection.

Is data the new highlight and
are fans the new
free agents?


Innovating without losing traditional fans

[ YES ]

The future is fan controlled

Discussion Points

Is technology making sports more of a product to consume rather than an experience to share?

Do we risk creating a generation of fans who are more loyal to algorithms than to teams?

Are we missing out on the “beautiful flaws” of sports in our pursuit of technologically enhanced perfection?

Do you agree with this?
Do you disagree or have a completely different perspective?
We’d love to know


The Future is Fan Controlled

The Future of Golf Will Be Simulated

Game Over? The Uncertain Future of Live Sports

The Death of Live Sports is Greatly Exaggerated

Live Sport Needs to Embrace the Realities of Reality TV

Tech: The Uncanny Valley of Fan Experience

The Fan Experience Event Preview

LIV Golf’s Playbook: Innovating Without Losing Traditional Fans

Home Field Advantage: The Community Experience is Paramount

Fans Are The New Free Agent

Did Tom Brady Really Say That?

An NBA Player Surveys the AI Opportunity

AI: A Goldmine or a Landmine For Athlete Brands?

Intellectual Property Law and AI: The Future of Athlete Branding